ExifTool is a customizable set of Perl modules plus a full-featured commandline application by Phil Harvey for reading and writing meta information in a wide variety of files, including the maker note information of many digital cameras by various manufacturers such as Canon, Casio, FLIR, FujiFilm, GE, HP, JVC/Victor, Kodak, Leaf, Minolta/Konica-Minolta, Nikon, Olympus Epson, Panasonic/Leica, Pentax/Asahi, Phase One, Reconyx, Ricoh, Samsung, Sanyo, Sigma/Foveon and Sony.
Mediainfo-gui will also use it for more detailed information on images (reason I added it in my repo).
Sources can be found here: https://sourceforge.net/projects/exiftool/
Attachment | Size | Date |
---|---|---|
![]() | 3.22 MB | 29/09/2018 - 16:08 |
![]() | 3.25 MB | 07/03/2019 - 00:47 |
![]() | 3.3 MB | 11/06/2019 - 23:53 |
![]() | 4.73 MB | 10/10/2019 - 19:18 |
![]() | 4.81 MB | 29/01/2020 - 14:46 |
![]() | 4.86 MB | 12/06/2020 - 18:07 |
![]() | 3.46 MB | 24/01/2021 - 23:48 |
![]() | 3.49 MB | 03/05/2021 - 13:03 |
![]() | 3.49 MB | 21/05/2021 - 11:53 |
![]() | 3.5 MB | 14/08/2021 - 13:23 |
![]() | 3.58 MB | 02/06/2022 - 00:11 |
![]() | 3.62 MB | 08/11/2022 - 18:05 |
![]() | 4.4 MB | 20/04/2023 - 21:50 |
![]() | 4.48 MB | 19/11/2023 - 22:02 |
Comments
olf
Thu, 2023/04/20 - 21:39
Permalink
Hi Arno,
I cannot install perl-image-exiftool-12.60-1.noarch.rpm on SailfishOS 3.2.1, because the RPM package is compresssed with zstd, in contrast tro the previous version perl-image-exiftool-12.50-1.noarch.rpm. Unfortunately I failed to find where the packaging for SailfishOS takes place. Please use %define _binary_payload w2.xzdio in its spec file, or indicate where the packaging takes place, so I can submit a commit.
Thanks!
ade
Thu, 2023/04/20 - 21:52
Permalink
I replaced it with a newly generated one. Should now be installable on older versions after a pkcon refresh.
olf
Fri, 2023/04/21 - 01:16
Permalink
Yes, it now installs fine. Thank you.
BTW, one shall not release a slightly different RPM package with the same name and [epoch-]version-release: This can confuse update and dependency resolving algorithms, even (rarely) result in a corrupted, local RPM database. Usually one simply increases something in the release field to mark the new package as a more recent release.
ade
Fri, 2023/04/21 - 18:13
Permalink
If you feel the recurring urge to lecture other people like they are a rookie, so be it. But please stay away from FUD like corrupted local RPM databases as a result of replacing a remote rpm. It just results in a change in local metadata after a refresh, like any change in a remote repo would. And of course it should have been an update by the rules, but just enjoy your new exiftool version and focus on more important things in life.
szopin
Mon, 2021/05/03 - 12:48
Permalink
https://www.reddit.com/r/netsec/comments/n36x7h/arbitrary_code_execution...
ade
Mon, 2021/05/03 - 13:04
Permalink
12.25 is now uploaded
szopin
Mon, 2021/05/03 - 13:43
Permalink
Great stuff, thanks!